SCI 115 Week 4 Discussion STR

Week 4 Discussion: Genome, Transcriptome and Proteome.

For your primary post, please respond to one of the following three with a post of at least 125 words addressing each point given in the instructions. Also, please reply to at least one fellow student on any topic.

• Topic 1. Omics video. Watch the instructor’s video about “-omics” (1)*, in the Instructor Insights section.

Note: If you choose this discussion topic, your answer must be based on the material specifically covered in the video, rather than generic information on –omics from the internet. If you would rather research information from the internet, then choose discussion Topic 3.

• • (a) Explain the concept of genome.
  • (b) Explain how the concept of transcriptome relates to messenger RNA (mRNA).
  • (c) Describe at least two additional things that you learned from the video.

• Topic 2. Synthetic genome video. Watch the instructor’s video about the synthetic genome “Syn 3.0” (2)* in the Instructor Insights section. Subsequently, answer the following:
  • (a) Explain how Syn 3.0 is different from naturally-occurring microorganisms.
  • (b) What do you think we’ve learned, if anything, from Syn 3.0? Explain.
  • (c) In your opinion, what are the inherent risks of this research to human health or to the environment, if any?

• Topic 3. Patent protection for BRCA genes. On the Internet, read one or more articles about how the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) ruled in the case of Association for Molecular Pathology versus Myriad Genetics. In your answer, give must credit your source(s). Your answer must address the following:
  • (a) Describe some of the major reasons why the plaintiffs objected to Myriad’s patent on the breast cancer-related genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2.
  • (b) Describe the SCOTUS ruling regarding naturally-occurring DNA sequences, as well as their ruling regarding DNA sequences that do not exist in Nature.

Note: the rulings of lower courts are NOT of interest for our purposes. Please concentrate only on SCOTUS’s ruling. The objective here is to emphasize the precedent-setting ruling of the highest court (SCOTUS), rather than to recount the litigation history.

• • (c) What is your view on the issue of whether we should allow human genes to be patented?
  • (d) Be absolutely sure that you cite your sources, and list your references.

*References (in Strayer Writing Standards format).

1. James Cox, January 21, 2018, Omics video [v2], Video can be found in the course shell (Week 4, Instructor Insights tab) or via the following link: https://cdnapisec.kaltura.com/index.php/extwidget/preview/partner_id/956951/uiconf_id/38285871/entry_id/0_1dbmbx95/embed/dynamic
2. James Cox, April 25, 2016, Synthetic genome Syn 3.0, Video can be found in the course shell (Week 4, Instructor Insights tab) or via the following link: https://cdnapisec.kaltura.com/index.php/extwidget/preview/partner_id/956951/uiconf_id/38285871/entry_id/0_rl8yrtfl/embed/dynamic

Course Tutor helps in providing the best essay writing service. If you need 100% original papers for SCI 115 Week 4 Discussion STR, then contact us through call or live chat.

SCI 115 Week 4 Discussion STR

ACCT 553 DeVry, BIAM 500 DeVry, CIS 500 STR, CIS 558 STR, ENG 105 GCU, FIN 390 DeVry, FIN 504 GCU, HCA 545 GCU, HCA 699 GCU, HLT 306 GCU, HLT 362 GCU, HLT 555 GCU, HLT 610 GCU, HLT 665 GCU, HOSP 594 DeVry, HRM 600 DeVry, MAT 144 GCU, MGMT 600, MGT 599 STR, MGT 655 GCU, MKT 373 GCU, PSY 362 GCU, PSY 565 GCU, PSY 575 GCU, PSY 665 GCU, SOC 102 GCU, SOC 320 GCU, SOC 372 GCU, SOC 412 GCU, NSG 6440 SU, HIM 515 GCU, NSG 4029 SU, HIM 615 GCU, NSG 3029 SU, NSG 4055 SU, NSG 6630 SU, NSG 6005 SU, CRMJ 310, PSY 510 GCU, CRMJ 300 Devry, CRMJ 425, SPD 200 GCU, HLT 490 GCU ,ECH 340 GCU, ECH 440 GCU, ECH 355 GCU, ECH 350 GCU, LDR 461 GCU, ECH 425 GCU, REL 212 STR, ,SCI 115 STR